Skip to content

The Year of the Snake in 2025 brings the promise of wisdom, adaptability, and transformation. However, hopes of renewed economic vigor may continue to slip past China. The policy pivot initiated in September 2024, while initially spurring a rally in the Chinese equity market, has gradually lost steam. Instead of optimism, disappointment has set in as the market grapples with the intervention’s smaller-than-expected scale, slower-than-anticipated pace, and lack of concrete follow-through on policy measures. The potential for an aggressive new US administration and looming trade war makes it even more imperative that China finds an antidote for its economic malaise.

How Effective Is China’s Policy Pivot So Far?

The impact of these policies on the real economy presents a mixed picture. Looking deeper into the execution, the prioritization within the "three arrows" of policy—moderately loose monetary policy, proactive fiscal stimulus, and structural rebalancing—has been skewed. The focus has largely been on monetary easing, followed by fiscal stimulus, while structural rebalancing has taken a backseat. This order of priority needs to be reversed. Lower interest rates alone will not stimulate credit demand or revive private sector investment when businesses lack the confidence to borrow. Fiscal policies also face an “agent” problem, as local governments grapple with dwindling land sales revenue and the constraints of anti-corruption campaigns. As a result, major progress in reversing key areas of weakness has been limited.

Property Sector: The property market has shown some signs of life, with sales picking up in top-tier cities. However, this revival remains fragile, particularly in lower-tier cities where a significant portion of sales and inventory resides. Home prices continue to decline, casting a shadow over the sustainability of this nascent recovery. The liquidity crisis faced by major developers, such as Vanke, further underscores the fragility of the property sector.

Economic Activity: The consumer "trade-in" and equipment upgrade program for household appliances, while gaining some traction, primarily serves to pull forward future demand. Manufacturing activity has remained largely stagnant, reflected in the flat manufacturing Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI). Conversely, the services PMI has shown a modest improvement. Deflationary pressures persist, with both the consumer and produce price indices (CPI and PPI) remaining stubbornly low. Despite a modest rise in money supply, credit impulse and fiscal impulse remain weak. This weakness stems from a lack of credit demand from the private sector, leading to a significant deceleration in private credit growth (see Exhibit 1).

 

Structural Challenges: Elevated debt levels, persistent deflation, and the worsening demographic landscape pose significant hurdles and further complicate the growth outlook. These challenges are compounded by policy dilemmas, such as balancing national security concerns with the need for market opening and reforms. Furthermore, policy constraints, such as the need to cut interest rates while maintaining bank profitability and the need to prevent capital outflow, introduce further limits.

Structural Imbalances: The past decade has witnessed an overemphasis on supply-side growth, leading to overcapacity, intense competition, and a deepening deflationary spiral. Industrial production and exports have surged beyond trend growth levels, while retail consumption and property investment have lagged significantly (see Exhibit 2). Rebalancing towards consumption is crucial to address this imbalance and break the savings glut cycle. While policymakers have pledged to "forcefully promote consumption" and "expand domestic demand," the scale of the "trade-in" program and wage rise for government employees remains relatively small.

China is known for its five-year plans, a series of initiatives that map out major social and economic strategies over five-year time periods. As 2025 marks the conclusion of the 14th Five-Year Plan, policymakers are likely to maintain the current 5% growth target. However, a large-scale stimulus package is unlikely, given the lessons learned from the Global Financial Crisis. Hence, the current policy pivot has proven to be insufficient and slow in its execution.

Property Market Remains Critical to Broader Recovery

Absent a larger fiscal stimulus, boosting household income, improving social safety nets, and restoring consumer confidence are critical steps. However, one of the biggest keys to recovery resides in the property sector. The lingering impact of the property downturn poses a significant challenge, particularly in lower-tier cities grappling with massive inventory overhangs. The lack of uptake for government "buyback" programs further exacerbates the issue. Until the property market heals, consumer confidence and private sector investment will remain subdued (see Exhibit 3).

Can China Avoid Japanification?

The decline of the 30-year Chinese government bond (CGB) yield below the 30-year Japanese government bond (JGB) yield raises concerns about a potential "lost decade" for the Chinese economy. While China faces significant demographic challenges, its lower gross domestic product (GDP) per capita and less leveraged households offer some advantages compared to Japan. However, the slow recovery of the property market and the risk of prolonged deflationary pressures remain significant.

Preparing for Tariff War 2.0

The potential for a new round of US tariffs poses a significant threat to China's growth. While China has taken steps to mitigate the impact of potential tariffs, the larger scale and broader scope of duties threatened by the new Trump administration, coupled with a weaker domestic economy, make the situation more challenging than the previous trade war.

China has made strides in protecting against trade threats, including diversifying its trade toward emerging markets (see Exhibit 4) and fostering technological self-reliance. However, the effectiveness of these measures remains uncertain. Additional measures that China could deploy in response to increased US tariffs include tit-for-tat tariff hikes and other retaliatory measures, such as export controls on critical minerals and restrictions on profit repatriation for multinational companies operating in China. Currency devaluation also could be used to partially offset the tariff shocks. Lastly, China can step up domestic monetary and fiscal easing policies. However, all of these measures come with economic trade-offs and potential geopolitical consequences. Further deterioration of US-China relations and the increased decoupling of the two economies pose significant risks.

Investment Implications

The "lower for longer" scenario remains the dominant outlook for CGB yields. The yield rally picked up speed in December due to the lackluster growth response from the policy pivot and shortage of haven assets amid unforeseen risks. The prolonged deflationary pressure is likely to drive CGB yield even lower, which may bode well for owning Chinese duration. Structurally slower growth with moderately easy fiscal policy and dovish monetary policy benefits CGB duration and bull flattening where long-term interest rates fall more than short-term interest rates, flattening the CGB yield curve. A continued lackluster credit impulse and the central bank’s quantitative easing also are additional catalysts for lower yields. Moderately increasing bond supply has not mattered to bond prices due to a captive buyer base. In addition, CGBs offer relatively high real yield and FX-hedged yield, low volatility, and low correlation with the US Treasury market for potential diversification benefits (see Exhibit 5).

Looking ahead, China continues to face significant hurdles and uncertainty. The National People’s Congress meeting in March may introduce further fiscal measures, but the market could be disappointed again if the interventions fail to reignite animal spirits with true reforms and structural rebalances. Furthermore, the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) needs to expand its balance sheet to provide more liquidity to the economy. The policy shift to focus on domestic consumption may have less spillover to other economies should China’s growth pick up. Lastly, the tariff war likely will reshuffle global supply chains further, creating new winners and losers.

The Chinese renminbi (CNY) still faces depreciation pressure from US dollar (USD) strength, negative interest rate differentials with the US, the pending tariff war, and slow growth. We expect CNY will continue to weaken versus USD in a controlled manner in the near term but may face strong headwinds that force a sharper depreciation to offset higher tariffs. CNY, which has not priced in severe tariff increases, remains strong against the China Foreign Exchange Trade System (CFETS) basket. Hence, we believe the currency has more room to depreciate if the reality turns out to be worse. Conversely, if the reality turns out to be better than expected, CNY should have room to appreciate. President Trump and Treasury Secretary nominee Scott Bessent have suggested that tariffs could be rolled out in a gradual manner, potentially allowing more time for a trade deal to be reached that could boost CNY.

Conclusion

The path ahead for the Chinese economy remains fraught with uncertainty. Addressing structural challenges, effectively implementing policy responses, and navigating geopolitical risks will be crucial for achieving sustainable long-term growth.

 

 

Index Definitions

The Consumer Price Index (CPI) is used to measure the change in the out-of-pocket expenditures of all urban households for a particular set of goods and services. In terms of its coverage, the CPI measures the cost of spending made directly by households for the items in its basket, with the notable exception that it also includes a measure of the rents that homeowners implicitly pay instead of renting their home.

The Producer Price Index (PPI) measures the average change in selling prices over time received by domestic producers for their output.

The Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI) is an economic indicator of the prevailing direction of a country’s economic trends in the manufacturing and service sectors. It is a diffusion index that summarizes whether market conditions are expanding, staying the same, or contracting by surveying senior purchasing executives at private sector companies.

Tracy Chen, CFA, CAIA

Portfolio Manager


 
Subscribe to Around the Curve and receive our latest global macroeconomic, fixed income, and equity views directly to your inbox. 
 

Groupthink is bad, especially at investment management firms. Brandywine Global therefore takes special care to ensure our corporate culture and investment processes support the articulation of diverse viewpoints. This blog is no different. The opinions expressed by our bloggers may sometimes challenge active positioning within one or more of our strategies. Each blogger represents one market view amongst many expressed at Brandywine Global. Although individual opinions will differ, our investment process and macro outlook will remain driven by a team approach.

Brandywine Global Logo

 

Social Media Guidelines

Brandywine Global Investment Management, LLC ("Brandywine Global") is an investment adviser registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). Brandywine Global may use Social Media sites to convey relevant information regarding portfolio manager insights, corporate information and other content.

Any content published or views expressed by Brandywine Global on any Social Media platform are for informational purposes only and subject to change based on market and economic conditions as well as other factors. They are not intended as a complete analysis of every material fact regarding any country, region, market, industry, investment or strategy. This information should not be considered a solicitation or an offer to provide any Brandywine Global service in any jurisdiction where it would be unlawful to do so under the laws of that jurisdiction. Additionally, any views expressed by Brandywine Global or its employees should not be construed as investment advice or a recommendation for any specific security or sector.

Brandywine Global will monitor its Social Media pages and any third-party content or comments posted on its Social Media pages. Brandywine Global reserves the right to delete any comment or post that it, in its sole discretion, deems inappropriate or prevent from posting any person who posts inappropriate or offensive content. Any opinions expressed by persons submitting comments don't necessarily represent the views of Brandywine Global. Brandywine Global is not affiliated with any of the Social Media sites it uses and is, therefore, not responsible for the content, terms of use or privacy or security policies of such sites. You are advised to review such terms and policies.